May 192009
 

Underneath all of the features and tools, Lightroom is, at its heart, a database program. One of the things that make Lightroom such a powerful and flexible application is its ability to help us find our images. As our collection of images grows it can become more and more difficult to locate that image of the puppy in the basket by the red flowers. But the keywords, metadata, collections, folders, and so on are all hooks Lightroom can use to search and find that puppy!

There is nothing in Lightroom to prevent you from creating more than one catalog to store your images. But should you? Let’s take a look at the reasons you might decide on one approach versus the other.

The Single Catalog Approach

The idea behind maintaining only one catalog stems from Lightroom’s extraordinary keywording and search features. Since, at its current version, Lightroom cannot search across multiple catalogs, it makes sense to have everything in one place. Otherwise you either have to remember which catalog the image of that puppy is in or open one catalog after the other, do the search, try again. Well, that’s not much better than just having everything on the drive and relying on folder names to categorize images.

Prior to version 2.x, Lightroom seemed to choke when your catalog got over 10,000 images. But with the current version and 64-bit code reports are that catalogs of 100,000 and 150,000 images are doing just fine! How large a catalog you can maintain depends on your underlying equipment (processor speed, RAM, drive space, etc.). One catalog makes your organizational life easier.

The functionality of multiple catalogs can be replaced by Lightroom’s Collections and Smart Collections. You can categorize your images, view them in their groups, and still have everything in one catalog.

The Multiple Catalog Approach

So why use multiple catalogs? There are valid reasons. Perhaps you want to keep your professional work separated from your family photos. Creating two catalogs in this case is perfectly valid.

Some wedding photographers will use one catalog per wedding. That keeps their workflow contained and helps prevent mixing up couples when presenting the slideshow or contact sheets. Here multiple catalogs can avoid embarrassing moments. And, if you have no intention of selling Bridal stock images, you may have no need to search through the different wedding catalogs.

Multiple catalogs will keep each individual catalog smaller and leaner. On older equipment this can be an answer to the performance issue.

Catalogs can serve as logical dividers if your photographic work spans several creative areas. For example, a catalog for your Landscapes, one for your commercial/product shots, another for studio work, and so on can help you keep those disciplines apart.

Keep in mind that if you go down the multiple catalog route you are giving up some of the search capabilities of Lightroom. However, if you have good reasons and it makes sense for your workflow then, by all means, separate your catalogs. There is no correct answer except the one that works for you.

Line Break

About the Author:
Contact Gene


Gene is an Adobe Community Professional, an Adobe Certified Expert in Photoshop Lightroomand an avid Lightroom fan. He has written several feature articles for Photoshop User Magazine and is the author of Explore Lightroom 4: A Roadmap for Photographers.

He belongs to the Professional Photographers of America (PPA) and the National Association of Photoshop Professionals (NAPP). Gene is the Co-Founder of the Dallas Fort Worth Adobe User Group (DFWAUG).

  • Laura

    Good post, Gene. I still don't get the wedding reasoning for multiple catalogs — simply having each wedding's images in a separate folder, and working that folder in LR will prevent mixing with other weddings. I would think that just about every wedding photographer would like to be able to pull up all their 5-star/porfolio-quality images from across all weddings — to show other clients or to consider for a website update — which argues of course for one catalog. You are being sensitive to other ways of doing things, but I will ask — is this a hold-over from the old days of LR 1 that is hurting wedding photographers?

  • http://lightroomsecrets.com Gene McCullagh

    Thanks, Laura!

    You're absolutely correct. I am an advocate for single catalogs. I do, however, use the family/professional distinction but don't consider that a real multiple catalog scenario. Yes, technically, it is multiple catalog but i don't consider those two realms as intersecting. Of course, if my family consisted of celebrities and models I'd have problem! LOL

    In the wedding scenario I think you are right, It could very well be an LR1 holdover. But I see it with wedding photographers the most. Folders and Collections are the answer to this in LR2. Perhaps I'll do a follow up just for wedding catalog(s) and drive them point a little harder.

  • Pingback: | Understanding White Balance

  • http://www.erikborst.com/ Erik Borst

    It would just be great when you can transfer selected photos in your library to a different catalog. Many times I have professional and private shots on one CF-card. When they're all being transferred to let's say my pro-catalog I would like to transfer these private shots to my private-catalog without closing down the pro-catalog I'm working in.

  • http://lightroomsecrets.com Gene McCullagh

    Yes, Erik, that would be a nice feature! Why now make that suggestion to the Lightroom team at http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?n

    For now, when you are in your private catalog you can import those shots directly from the pro catalog. Then, you can delete them from the pro catalog. If you use collections to sequester your private shots it will be easier to locate and work with these images. Not the most elegant solution, but the best we have right now.

  • Anonymous

    Wouldn’t a catalog of catalogs (meta-catalog?) make multiple catalogs easier to use?

  • Colin_E

    Wouldn't a catalog of catalogs (meta-catalog?) make multiple catalogs easier to use?

  • http://lightroomsecrets.com Gene McCullagh

    Hi Colin!

    I suppose so. But one could make the argument that Collections (and Smart Collections) could be thought of as catalogs within the catalog. I think it all comes down to what your workflow is and why you gravitate towards one, two, or more catalogs.

    LR is still a relatively young application and I’m confident we will see some interesting solutions to these issues as more features are added and improved.

  • http://lightroomsecrets.com Gene McCullagh

    Hi Colin!

    I suppose so. But one could make the argument that Collections (and Smart Collections) could be thought of as catalogs within the catalog. I think it all comes down to what your workflow is and why you gravitate towards one, two, or more catalogs.

    LR is still a relatively young application and I'm confident we will see some interesting solutions to these issues as more features are added and improved.

  • new balance

    “Here air jordan 21 products xx, has fashion model, superior quality and service, cheap price and updates quickly.I support strongly always! I want to buy XX, I hesitate to select which style more better.Hope your unique recommends.